| Can I Come Look At These Items? | | This online store is in association with Amazon.com, so these great, high-qualiy products will come from their warehouse or from other partners. Thanks for shopping! |
|
|
|
Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Boys, Size S/M (38-65 Lbs), 27-Count Packages (Pack of 3) | 
 enlarge | Brand: Pampers
Category: Health And Beauty
List Price: $55.99
Buy New: $51.00
You Save: $4.99 (9%)
New (2) from $51.00
Avg. Customer Rating:  10 reviews
Sales Rank: 524
Size: Boys S/M, 38-65 Lbs. (81 UnderJams)
Shipping Weight (lbs): 10.4
Dimensions (in): 15.4 x 12.3 x 10.9
ASIN: B0015MVHXQ
Release Date: April 14, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Features:
| • | Case Pack of three 27-count packages (81 total UnderJams) | | • | UnderJams absorbent underwear for bedwetters features NightLock absorbent core | | • | Made with quiet, cloth-like materials to help give kids the privacy they want | | • | Designed like underwear, lets skin breathe | | • | Night Wear with the quality you expect from Pampers |
|
| Similar Items:
| • | Pampers Cruisers, Size 4, Economy Plus Pack, 140 Cruisers | | • | Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Boys, Size L/XL (58-85 Lbs), 21-Count Packages (Pack of 3) | | • | Pampers Baby Wipes Refills, Natural Aloe, Unscented, 770 Wipes | | • | Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Girls, Size S/M (38-65 Lbs), 27-Count Packages (Pack of 3) | | • | Huggies Pull-Ups Night*Time Pants, Size 3T-4T Boy, Four - 24 Count Jumbo Packs (96 Training Pants) |
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 5 more reviews...
 Very tight, but soft October 2, 2008
We buy these pants as diapers for our one-year-old son. At 13 months, he's 42 pound due to side effects of cancer. These work okay as a diaper, but obviously they are not intended for that as they don't have side snaps. They are very soft to the touch as compared to the older Goodnites (though the newer ones I purchased recently were "improved") and they seem thicker. The only thing I don't like and the reason I gave only 4 stars is that even though the pack states up to 65 pounds, we find that they are really tight on our son. If your child is slim, this wouldn't be a problem for you, but our son is still very rolly-poly with baby fat plus some. Overall a nice product from Pampers, but as usual with Pampers, a very, very premium price considering how many we are going through.
pampers underjams September 10, 2008
Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Boys, Size S/M (38-65 Lbs), 27-Count Packages (Pack of 3)
they are great my son feels so much more comfortable they hide easily under pajamas!!! Very absorbent as well!!!
 Working great for us! August 27, 2008
I bought these for my 4 1/2 year old son who still needs to wear something at night. We have used 2 packs of them already and have not had one single leaking accident. The Pull-Ups were leaking constantly and the Goodnites were very expensive and leaking occasionally too. These were lower priced so I gave them a try. The only thing I notice with these is that they tend to be a bit large and sometimes pull down on my son's waist. He is 40 lbs. and I use the s/m size.
Great! August 19, 2008
We've been using UnderJams for about 2 months on our 4-year old. We tried them just as a cheaper alternative to Good Nites (only $.70 cheaper at our grocer) but ended up liking them more. We have had NO problems with them leaking. Our son likes the design better - they don't seem like diapers, or big and bulky. They seem more like underwear to him - helping him to learn to use the potty instead of wetting. Definitely love UnderJams.
 Thought I'd finally found an affordable option to Goodnites. Nope. August 10, 2008
I've tried every single option to try to find something more affordable than Goodnights. But nothing works. I THOUGHT these were the first viable, somewhat less expensive option. But they only work about 50% of the time. We have a LOT of overflows...such that my boys (ages 6 and 7) are totally soaked...clear up to their entire shirts! The sheet changing so often just isn't worth the couple of dollars I can save with this brand. Alas...like the rest of you...I'm back to Goodnights and the extra money. Sigh.
|
|
|
| |
News 
