Kodak Glossy Photo Paper, 8.5 x 11 Inches, 100 Sheets per Pack (8209017) |  | Brand: Kodak Category: Office Product
List Price: $14.99 Buy New: $12.55 as of 11/21/2009 23:25 CST details You Save: $2.44 (16%)
New (9) Used (1) from $12.55
Seller: Shoplet Rating: 20 reviews Sales Rank: 147
Color: White Autographed: No Memorabilia: No Number Of Items: 1 Batteries Included: No Size: 8.5 x 11 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.7 Dimensions (in): 11.1 x 8.6 x 0.8 Warranty: 1 year parts
MPN: 8209017 Model: 8209017 UPC: 041778209011 EAN: 0041778209011 ASIN: B000EZ0CTU
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | Perfect for everyday photo printing. | | • | Instant dry. | | • | No smearing or smudging. | | • | Pack of 100 Sheets |
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description Make every day extraordinary with KODAK Photo Paper. Now it's easy to make more of your pictures. Just pick your picture, pick your paper, and press print for quality only Kodak can deliver.PRODUCT FEATURES:Instant dry;For quality, colorful prints;Affordably priced;Perfect for everyday printing;No smearing, no smudging;Universal compatibility.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 20
Kodak Glossy Photo Paper October 30, 2009 Allan H. Peterson I buy lots of photo paper and print lots of photos. This is a good quality paper at a reasonable price.
Follow the star signs September 23, 2009 A. Nelson (utah) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I think it is time Kodak got a fair review on this product. I decided to take a gamble on it even knowing it probably wouldn't meet my expectations. Upfront: If you are looking for photo quality prints, do not buy this paper. Use Kodaks star rating system that they provide for a reason and purchase 4 or 5 star paper. Personally I am quite happy with the quality prints of their 4 Star Premium Paper, At least in the 4x6 size I feel it is photo quality, or at least very very close to it. I couldn't tell a difference between the 4 star, and the 5 star Ultra Premium paper. (haven't printed an 8x10 yet, will update this if my opinion changes after doing so) so unless you are trying to sell prints, go for the 4 star. You will not be disappointed.
Now back to the 3 star. The print quality is slightly better than the paper I found at my local dollar store. Keep this in mind before purchasing. Color photos it does not produce. It would be great for scrapbooking, or other arts and crafts that you want to be better than just paper prints. Could also be very useful for flyers or post cards. I am not completely disappointed though. Black and white prints turn out just fine in my eyes.
Bottom line, you get what you pay for, and I commend Kodak for being upfront about it with a rating system. I am not supposed to mention prices, but lets see if they will let me do this. I paid just a little more for half the sheets of the 4 star Premium paper (Kodak Glossy Premium Photo Paper, 8.5 x 11 Inches, 50 Sheets per Pack (8360513))and it is worth the extra money.
FYI: I am using the Kodak ESP 5 All In One Printer.
Awful August 29, 2009 Leslie Colgin (Los Angeles, CA) It is staggering how awful this paper is. The results are so incredibly disappointing. I can't tell you how much ink I've wasted trying to make it work... trying different settings. No matter what, the results turn out -- as someone else said -- mud.
I'm throwing away most of the pack, because regular paper is seriously better than this.
Kodak really shouldn't put out a product like this. Really tarnishes their reputation if you ask me.
Kodak, the First Name in Paper, is Now Last On My List August 18, 2009 Ethan A. Winning (Walnut Creek, CA) 2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I had been using Kodak film and paper for over 40 years, and now am truly saddened by what has happened to what was an American institution. I saw the end of film, evidently before Kodak did. But I still believed that their paper would be top quality as it has been for the 60 years (yes, 60) that I used Kodak paper. I don't know why, but in comparing Kodak to HP Premium Plus Photo Paper, HP gets 4.5 stars and Kodak 2. With Kodak, I've had some bleeding problems and, few though they may be, an 8x10 uses a lot of ink - expensive ink - and to toss a photo because of bleeding or fading or crinkling is just too expensive and disappointing for me.
It's not all about money, but it it's certainly the major factor. Still, when used on an Epson or HP printer, Kodak paper just doesn't live up to the claims of the company. While I have had to let others dry for a day (to be safe) so they won't stick to frames or other photos, Kodak seems to need even more time.
I've had some fading which just should not be. But perhaps the worst problem is slippage and ultimate crinkling or printing off-center.
I have not used this on a Kodak printer. The only Kodak printer I purchased did not work, and I returned it and bought a Canon. Now that that has broken after 3 years, I'll be looking at Canon and Epson, but not Kodak and not HP. Much as I like HP's paper, their ink is even more expensive than others.
My new life goal at this point is to have a printer break just as I've used up all the ink that I have for it. Since I'll have HP paper, THAT is the only thing I don't have to worry about.
Kodak paper August 9, 2009 J. M. Gulizia (Omaha, NE) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
The only problem I have against this paper is it will stick to the next sheet. I can only load one paper at a time in my printer. It also takes time to dry.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 20
|
|
|