| Can I Come Look At These Items? | | This online store is in association with Amazon.com, so these great, high-qualiy products will come from their warehouse or from other partners. Thanks for shopping! |
|
|
|
Claim of Privilege: A Mysterious Plane Crash, a Landmark Supreme Court Case, and the Rise of State Secrets | 
 enlarge | Author: Barry Siegel
Publisher: Harper
Category: Book
List Price: $25.95
Buy New: $8.80
You Save: $17.15 (66%)
New (37) Used (15) from $8.80
Avg. Customer Rating:  6 reviews
Sales Rank: 413390
Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 400
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.1
Dimensions (in): 8.9 x 6.1 x 1.6
ISBN: 0060777028
Dewey Decimal Number: 342.73
EAN: 9780060777029
ASIN: 0060777028
Publication Date: June 1, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Book is Brand New! MINT!!
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
In the tradition of A Civil Action and Gideon's Trumpet, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Barry Siegel unfolds the shocking true story behind the Supreme Court case that forever changed the balance of power in America. On October 6, 1948, a trio of civilian engineers joined a U.S. Air Force crew on a B-29 Superfortress, whose mission was to test secret navigational equipment. Shortly after takeoff the plane crashed, killing all three engineers and six others. In June 1949, the widows of the engineers filed suit against the government. What had happened to their men? they asked. Why had these civilians been aboard an Air Force plane in the first place? But the Air Force, at the dawn of the Cold War, refused to hand over the accident reports and witness statements, claiming the documents contained classified information that would threaten national security. The case made its way up to the Supreme Court, which in 1953 sided with the Air Force in United States v. Reynolds. This landmark decision formally recognized the "state secrets" privilege, a legal precedent that has since been used to conceal conduct, withhold documents, block troublesome litigation, and, most recently, detain terror suspects without due-process protections. Even with the case closed, the families of those who died in the crash never stopped wondering what had happened in that B-29. They finally had their answer a half century later: In 2000 they learned that the government was now making available the top-secret information the families had sought long ago, in vain. The documents, it turned out, contained no national security secrets but rather a shocking chronicle of negligence. Equal parts history, legal drama, and expose, Claim of Privilege tells the story of this shameful incident, its impact on our nation, and a courageous fight to right a wrong from the past. Placing the story within the context of the time, Siegel draws clear connections between the apocalyptic fears of the early Cold War years and post-9/11 America—and shows the dangerous consequences of this historic cover-up: the violation of civil liberties and the abuse of constitutional protections. By evoking the past, Claim of Privilege illuminates the present. Here is a mesmerizing narrative that indicts what our government is willing to do in the name of national security.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 1 more reviews...
 Read This Book September 10, 2008
Barry Siegel,a Pulitzer prize winning writer, offers a meticulously researched, beautifully written story of the genesis of expanded executive power and the government secrets privilige. In so doing, he puts a human face on a real tragedy for the families involved in the court case and for the entire nation.
Beware the Claim of State Secrets July 29, 2008
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
No one questions that governments need to keep some things secret. There is no reason that I should be able to get detailed blueprints on the newest of submarines, for instance, nor need I decode the latest messages going to the generals in Afghanistan. In matters of national security, keeping secrets even from citizens is only sensible. There is a problem, though, that it is the national government that makes decisions about what is a matter of national security. There are other reasons to keep secrets, like covering up blunders or limiting financial redress against the government, and bureaucrats may be eager to claim that these must be kept secret and ask for your faith that they need the secrecy in the interest of national security. There is an important Supreme Court decision that first put the "states secrets privilege" into the law, _United States vs. Reynolds_ of 1953, and it is a basis for subsequent states secret decisions, of which , of course, there have been many. It is a shock to find out that the decision was based on lies presented by the prosecution, and that the government fallaciously insisted that the details that would have shown them to be lies were too secret for the courts to consider. In _Claim of Privilege: A Mysterious Plane Crash, a Landmark Supreme Court Case, and the Rise of State Secrets_ (Harper), journalist Barry Siegel has told the amazing, often distressing story of this case. In a riveting narrative, he tells us about the personalities behind the decision, the families that were affected by it, the historical context of the times in which it was made, and the governmental aftereffects. It has much of the David-versus-Goliath appeal of a legal thriller, while it also throws light on current governmental insistence on the privilege of keeping secrets.
The decision arose out of a 1948 crash of a B-29 Superfortress bomber which was testing secret electronics, and which crashed, killing nine of thirteen men aboard. Among the dead were three civilian RCA engineers, and their widows claimed the crash was a result of government negligence. There are always accident reports after such crashes, but after the suit was brought by the widows, the Justice department claimed the accident report was a national security secret, even though it had nothing to do with the secret electronics on board. Lower courts rejected such a declaration, but the Supreme Court decided that courts should accept any executive branch claim of secrecy and not look any deeper; part of the court's deference to the government was that the political atmosphere was thick with communist plots and international threats. The lower courts decided rightly; the Supreme Court was presented with a fraud, and wrongly decided on the basis of that fraud. The latter part of this book is a satisfying human story of how children of the dead engineers and the one remaining widow got together starting in 2000 to pursue their claim, and how the original law firm that has pursued the case was eager to take up the battle again.
It turned out to be, at best, a muted victory; national security concerns were high at the time of the new claim, just as they had been at the time of the original one. The new claim, however, made it clear that the original one had been based on a fraudulent claim of national security. The claimants weren't interested in repealing the original decision, or attempting to tear down established national security law. What they accomplished was that judges, when confronted with lawyers for the Justice Department claiming secrecy due to _Reynolds_, had to remember the faulty background behind the original judgement, and ought more closely to consider whether something is a secret just because the government says so. It is good to remember this at a time when the state secrets privilege is a favorite tool to drop whistle-blowers, restrain investigation into detentions, and promote surveillance programs. Siegel is too good a journalist to let his book turn into a manifesto against the secret-hugging current administration, and though he mentions some current cases, his criticism is mostly implicit. Nonetheless, this is a powerful legal story which convincingly shows that citizens ought to have a measure of distrust when the government waves the "state secret" flag.
Under the radar. July 20, 2008
"Claim of Privilege" is a fascinating work of nonfiction that reads like a novel. Not only does it recount the details of a little-known military plane crash, but also our government's abuse of power. Once you read Siegel's book, you'll want to share it with others.
The essential backstory to presidential abuse of power July 20, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
If you really want to know how Cheney, Bush & Co (along with Nixon and every other administration from 1948 on)can legally stonewall the country on critically important matters of war and peace, READ THIS BOOK. It's a rigorously reported, mindblowing narrative about the first "state secrets" case, brought six decades ago against the U.S. government by the widows of three civilian engineers killed during a test flight for the Air Force. The widows wanted to know why their husbands died; the government refused to tell them, claiming that "military secrets" would be compromised. In fact, the U.S. wasn't about to make public the real cause of their husbands' deaths: The plane's known but uncorrected mechanical flaws and the pilot's incompetence. And the Supreme Court ruled (why is this no surprise?)in favor of the U.S. What do three widows and their newly fatherless children matter compared to protecting "state secrets"--even if they're bogus? There's much, much more to Siegel's harrowing, multigenerational story, but I won't spoil it for you. Just buy the book.
 A deep problem; a shallow book July 12, 2008
0 out of 2 found this review helpful
The unilateral invocation of the 'state secrets' doctrine by the government is frought with problems. This book sets forth the history of the leading Supreme Court case on the subject. But it approaches the task more as an exercise in telling the story of the 'sleuthing' by the heirs of the three of the civilians killed in the Air Force accidednt giving rise to the intial litigation than as an analysis of the issues. Half a century after the events, the issues are fascinating, the human story is simply not all that interesting, however painful for the participants.
On page 300, the author rattles off a half dozen current cases where the Bush administration successfully blocked private litigations by invocation of the doctrine, providing a half sentence summary of each. The details of those sister suits are much more important than the details of where the widows and orphans met for lunch. But, in nthis work, 'human interest' substitutes for policy analysis.
The truly core question tends to get lost in all the story telling. Much less shocking than the Supreme Court's sanctioning the government's refusal to allow the heirs to examine the official report of the air accident is the fact that the Court did not require the government to submit the allegedly 'secret' report to the presiding judge for in camera inspection. The Supreme Court submitted to the unilateral truncation of the judiciary's customary function.
Finally, and a complaint which probably only a lawyer would be likely to make, while I am appalled by the government's conduct in this case, I have a strong suspicion that a much better defense/explanation for its performance could be written than Mr. Siegel has provided. The issue is too important for polemic
|
|
|
| |
News 
