| Can I Come Look At These Items? | | This online store is in association with Amazon.com, so these great, high-qualiy products will come from their warehouse or from other partners. Thanks for shopping! |
|
|
|
A Nuclear Family Vacation: Travels in the World of Atomic Weaponry | 
 enlarge | Authors: Sharon Weinberger, Nathan Hodge
Publisher: Bloomsbury USA
Category: Book
List Price: $24.99
Buy New: $10.00
You Save: $14.99 (60%)
New (35) Used (15) from $4.99
Avg. Customer Rating:  3 reviews
Sales Rank: 72854
Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1st
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 336
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.4
Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.4 x 1.3
ISBN: 1596913789
Dewey Decimal Number: 623.45119
EAN: 9781596913783
ASIN: 1596913789
Publication Date: June 10, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: A nice clean hardcover, in excellent dj, of the 2008 Bloomsbury 1st edition (as pictured). No marks to text. Ready to ship.
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Two Washington, D.C., defense reporters do for nukes what Sarah Vowell did for presidential assassinations in this fascinating, kaleidoscopic portrait of nuclear weaponry.
In A Nuclear Family Vacation, husband-and-wife journalists Sharon Weinberger and Nathan Hodge hit the open road to explore the secretive world of nuclear weaponry. Along the way, they answer the questions most nuclear tourists don’t get to ask: Are nuclear weapons still on hair-trigger alert? Is there such a thing as a suitcase nuke? Is Iran really building the bomb? Together, Weinberger and Hodge visit top-secret locations like the Isfahan Uranium Conversion Facility in Iran, the United States’ Kwajalein military outpost in the Marshall Islands, the Y-12 facility in Tennessee, and “Site R,” a bunker known as the “Underground Pentagon,” rumored to be Vice President Cheney’s personal “undisclosed location” of choice. Their atomic road trip reveals plans to revitalize the U.S. nuclear arsenal, even as the United States pushes other countries to disarm. Weaving together travel writing with world-changing events, A Nuclear Family Vacation unearths unknown—and often quite entertaining—stories about the nuclear world.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Does not quite live up to the comparisons made July 21, 2008
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
My interest in this book was piqued by the favorable comparisons made between this and Assassination Vacation. While this title was a good (if a little dry) read, the writing lacked Ms. Vowell's ease. Because of the scattered nature of the trips required for this book, a smooth narrative flow does not exists, since months, if not years, separate the chapters.
This is a good library candidate, but nothing I would keep in my permanent collection.
 A great read if you are interested in Nukes! June 28, 2008
2 out of 5 found this review helpful
For those of you that enjoy reading about esoteric yet important topics
such as Nuclear Community this is a great read! Similar in many ways to the works of J. Bamford who writes extensively on the NSA.
It takes the reader from Livermore CA and Nevada to Oak Ridge and Russia.
A highly recommended well written book albeit too esoteric of a subject for some.
Makes this reader wonder what is our current real reason for nukes as the USSR is a thing of the past.
Enjoy!!
At times fascinating but not perfect June 26, 2008
8 out of 8 found this review helpful
As the whimsical title indicates, this is sort of a radioactive version of P.J. O'Rourke's "Holidays in Hell." The authors, a husband and wife team of journalists, spent several years touring the nuclear weapons archipelago of the United States and made side trips to Kazakhstan, Russia, and Iran.
In my opinion, the best parts of the book by far are the ones that deal with the facilities in the US such as Los Alamos, the Nevada Test Site, "Site R," and the Congressional Doomsday Bunker at Greenbrier, West Virginia. The authors interviewed a fair number of people at each place and that makes their destinations come alive (as someone who has been to Los Alamos and the Nevada Test Site, I can attest to the accuracy). I also thought the chapter about the men and women who man the ICBM silos shed light on a world and career field that I knew little about.
The book does have some weak parts. The authors pretty much got the run around while in Russia (which is to say no admission to any sites that are involved in Russia's ongoing nuclear weapons programs). Given that fact, I would have ditched that chapter and added more about American sites (perhaps the Pantex Plant in Texas). I feel the same about the trip to Esfahan, Iran (where the authors are smart enough to realize that the Iranians were putting on a propaganda display). I also think the authors gave the Iranians too much of a benefit of a doubt about their nuclear program's peaceful intentions (if you build and operate nuclear facilities that you don't declare to the IAEA as required by the Nonproliferation Treaty, it's hard to come up with an innocent explanation).
I also think that the book would have benefited from a complete chapter talking about the various hair-raising accidents that have taken place with nuclear weapons (such as the recent one involving the B-52 that flew across America with no one realizing it was carrying nuclear-tipped cruise missiles).
Finally, I think the conclusions of the book aren't very strong. The authors make a pretty good case for the idea that the raison d'etre for our nuclear weapons complex has partially evaporated with the end of the Cold War. And I give them kudos for not demanding that we relinquish nuclear weapons. But they didn't seem to be very concerned with the fact that we might still need a fair number of nuclear weapons on alert in order to deter a Russia that seems to be resembling the Evil Empire of yore more and more every day and a China whose leaders have casually talked about how the threat of them incinerating Los Angeles might deter us from going to the aid of Taiwan.
I particularly believe that this is the case with the "Reliable Replacement Warhead." The authors aren't overtly hostile to the idea of fielding such a new weapon. But they don't really seem to realize that if we are going to be able to preserve a credible nuclear deterrent force, we better have weapons that we can count on to perform exactly as they were designed, instead of the aging ones we currently have.
But in the end, the light that the authors shed on this little known in the post-Cold War era topic make book well worth reading.
|
|
|
| |
News 
