| Can I Come Look At These Items? | | This online store is in association with Amazon.com, so these great, high-qualiy products will come from their warehouse or from other partners. Thanks for shopping! |
|
|
|
The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Expose | 
 enlarge | Author: David Ray Griffin
Publisher: Olive Branch Press
Category: Book
List Price: $20.00
Buy New: $13.55
You Save: $6.45 (32%)
New (22) Used (7) from $12.57
Avg. Customer Rating:  26 reviews
Sales Rank: 23861
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 358
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 8.9 x 6 x 1.2
ISBN: 1566567297
Dewey Decimal Number: 973.931
EAN: 9781566567299
ASIN: 1566567297
Publication Date: September 30, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: *- INTERNATIONL SHIPPING!!! SHIPS from 5 locations based on your Zip Code and availability! (PA TN IN OR SC) *-* Gift Quality *-* Orders Processed Immediately! - We get your book to you Very Quickly! 57.59
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
In 2004, David Ray Griffin published The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11. Translated into several languages, it helped spark a worldwide movement demanding "9/11 truth." Even as it became increasingly outdated, it continued to be widely cited as the best introduction to the issues. Griffin has now written The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, which provides a chapter-by-chapter updating of the information provided in that earlier book. It shows that the case against the official account constructed by independent researchers - who now include architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, politicians, and former military officers - is far stronger than it was in 2004, leaving no doubt that 9/11 was a false flag operation, designed to give the Bush-Cheney administration a pretext to attack oil-rich Muslim nations. Taken together, these two books provide everything one needs to make an informed decision about 9/11 - whether one is a journalist, a political leader, a religious leader, or an ordinary citizen concerned about truth, democracy, and the rule of law.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 21 more reviews...
 The Updated 'Bible' for 9/11 Truth November 24, 2008
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
For those of you unfamiliar with the alternative theories surrounding 9/11, get The New Pearl Harbor and PLEASE read it first. READ IT NOW-PUT WHATEVER YOU ARE CURRENTLY READING ON HOLD. Then pass it along to another, it is that important.
For those familiar with the subject, Griffin has once again done a masterful job of presenting the continuing development of the movement, amending minor mistakes made in the first volume and disclosing even more evidence that has surfaced during the four years since NPH was published. A must-read.
Massive evidence November 8, 2008
7 out of 7 found this review helpful
D.R. Griffin's second book on the 9/11 massacre is a terribly skilled comment on his first version, with some rectifications and some meticulous unraveling of controversial statements, timings and physical processes.
His overall picture stands more firmly than ever `that every dimension of the official account is false beyond reasonable doubt.' Hereafter, a few crucial points:
-the free vertical fall of the 3 WTC towers (of which one was not hit by a plane) makes a rather cynical joke of the NIST report. Controlled demolition is the only plausible explanation.
-the official version of the fact that the airplanes could not be scrambled doesn't stand a close examination of all the timings involved. A stand down order explains everything.
-the Pentagon could not have been hit by a plane, unless all its debris should have evaporated after the impact. A missile attack is more plausible.
-the identity of the hijackers, if any, is extremely obscure. For D.R. Griffin, much of the evidence that there were hijackers on the planes dissipates upon close examination. The planes could have been flown by remote control. See M.H. Gaffey's book `The 9/11 Mystery Plane and the Vanishing of America'.
-the true identity of Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda is anything but clear.
-cell phone calls could not be made from inside the airplanes.
-a close examination of the official 9/11 Commission Report shows that all controversial points were omitted or the subject of biased interpretations.
It all insinuates that all the deadly attacks were an inside job.
But why? They served as an excuse to wage war. D.R. Griffin: 'Members of the Bush-Cheney administration planned prior to 9/11 invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, after which they hoped to attack five other countries. The commission shielded its readers from evidence that this administration include people with an even more murderous ideology.'
In the meantime, the public media continue to be completely gagged. A rather menacing silence is sometimes overshadowing the TV and radio studios and stations.
D.R. Griffin incriminates nobody. All he wants is a new and independent investigation to discover the truth.
This book with its perfect index and bibliography is a must read for all those interested in the 9/11 massacre and for all those who want to understand the world we live in.
The importance of facts. October 22, 2008
5 out of 6 found this review helpful
It is a fact of life, if you drop a sledge hammer on your big toe, you are going to feel it, unless of course you've had too many beers and the pain is dulled. When you wake up the next morning, you wonder how come you can't walk without pain or at all. Denial seems to be the "new culture" that has grown up around sports viewing, celebrity nonsense, a diminishing industrial base, over extended armies and an arrogance that America is still "king of the hill." Anyone who has read history, about Rome or any other empire, knows the signs of a country in decay. Denial is the fuel that burns up the backbone of any country.
There is no such thing as a conspiracy theory, or fringe radicals, conservatives or liberals. Those are simply tents in which people house themselves, to launch their view of reality in the form of policies or agendas. None of these tents have to do with the truth or cold hard facts. And ignoring cold hard facts is denial. Read David Ray Griffin's books including this one, an updated version of The New Pearl Harbor, in which he brings more facts about 9/11 to light which are inconsistent with the official "facts" presented to us by the media, by government and a host of vested entities not wanting to face facts about who we have become and who we are. Have the courage to get out of your tent, lay down the labels and make up your own mind but only after reviewing the facts Mr. Griffin puts on the table. Then, when you are through reading this book, if you are troubled by the facts he presents,or even disagree with them, do more research, and watch the videos and corroborating evidence easily accessed on Google, until you come up with a picture that matches reality, not the one you want to believe or need to believe. Why? The country you live in depends upon citizens who face facts. If we are in fact a government for, by and of the people, you have a civic responsibility to educate yourself about hard truths. Why? Ultimately the very freedoms you cherish depend upon your involvement and your ability to educate yourself with facts, not belief systems issued from one tent or another. David Ray Griffin, has done his part to educate himself and others. Read his book and educate yourself. Our country depends upon it. If you read it with an open mind, you will see that as Shakespeare wrote, that something "is rotten in the state of Denmark." Why? Because so many of the facts you accept about 9/11 do not match up with facts Griffin presents. To shuck him off ( or anyone else) as a fringe radical or a conspiracy theorist in the name of protecting yourself, does nothing to change the facts. It just means you don't have the courage to face something you may not want to face. As a pilot, I said, at the time, after the second tower was hit, "There is the longest 20 minutes in modern America History." Why? We were under "attack" the official version goes. The north tower had already been hit, where were the fighter planes to shoot down the second jet before it hit the South Tower to protect our citizens from the "attack?" The US military had 20 minutes to get a jet there and to shoot down anything over NYC. Where was it? It is a fair question. An important question. Start there with the same question and you will be surprised that the answer doesn't jibe with the official account of 9/11. This book, in order to educate yourself, is a masterful account of those "other" facts that don't jibe with the official facts. Read it. You may not like what you find, but at least you will be closer to the "facts" of the case.
Another excelent read by Davd Griffin October 15, 2008
3 out of 5 found this review helpful
I highly recommend this for everybody to read. It's all there in black and white, thoroughly researched and up to date. We have all been lied to by the government with tons of help from the media. I believe they lie about almost everything but the 'official' accounting of what happened on 9/11 is surely a lie, and a big one at that. This so called 'war on terror' is based on lies. For folks that want the REAL news go to www.infowars.com
 What are the (blankety-blanking) FACTS? October 15, 2008
5 out of 20 found this review helpful
"Some wannabe indie filmmaker searching for existentialism through a haze of bong smoke." -- John Travolta, "Swordfish"
That quote bounced through my head as I labored my way through a theologian's take on 9/11. Griffin suffers from a rather severe case of logorrhea, which makes his arguments--when he actually makes arguments, which is seldom--hard to follow.
Robert Heinlein put it best: " . . . what are the facts, and to how many decimal places?"
Don't ask Dr. Griffin for those facts. He won't give them to you.
Griffin's book pretends to ask many questions--but ignores the answers if those answers are at all inconvenient to his . . . "theory" would be far too generous a term for his writings, as "theory" implies that he offers a systematic explanation of the events of 9/11. He doesn't. In fact, he seems to actually oppose any effort to develop such a theory, because in doing so, the theorist opens his arguments to criticism.
When someone runs away from cold, hard fact and retreats into speculation that is explicitly fact-free, he's not worth taking seriously, no matter what your beliefs about 9/11.
|
|
|
| |
News 
